top of page

ARTificial: Why Copyright Is Not the Right Policy Tool to Deal with Generative AI

Yale Law Journal

2024

There is an ongoing war between creative industries and artists against Generative AI. But what if we got it wrong, and expanding copyright is not the solution?

The rapid advancement and widespread application of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) raise complex issues regarding authorship, originality, and the ethical use of copyrighted materials for AI training.

As attempts to regulate AI proliferate, this Essay proposes a taxonomy of reasons, from the perspective of creatives and society alike, that explain why copyright law is ill-equipped to handle the nuances of AI-generated content.

Originally designed to incentivize creativity, copyright doctrine has been expanded in scope to cover new technological mediums. This expansion has proven to increase the complexity and uncertainty of copyright doctrine’s application—ironically leading to the stifling of innovation. In this Essay, I warn that further attempts to expand the interpretation of copyright doctrine to accommodate the particularities of GAI might well worsen that problem, all while failing to fulfill copyright’s stated goal of protecting creators’ rights to consent, attribution, and compensation.

Moreover, I argue that, in that expansion, there is the peril of overreaching copyright laws that will negatively impact society and the development of ethical AI. This Essay explores the philosophical, legal, and practical dimensions of these challenges in four parts.


Suggested citation: Mantegna, Micaela, ARTificial: Why Copyright Is Not the Right Policy Tool to Deal with Generative AI (April 22, 2024). The Yale Law Journal Forum | April 22, 2024, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5090127 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5090127




Join @Braindancing in the Metaverse!
(a weekly newsletter on metaverse ethics, and  trends from crypto,  neurotech, gaming and regulation).
bottom of page